[supermatt]

> The whole point if async messaging is that you'll reply when you're available.

Yeah, exactly. So how does someone sending you ANY message make a difference? If you are getting distracted by a "hello" you are getting distracted by ANY message, so you may as well turn your notifications OFF and handle messaging asynchronously - its built into the system itself...

[smeej]

My notifications are always off. When I do have time to respond, if someone has sent me an actual question, I can just send them an answer. If all they've said is "Hello," now I have to send them a message asking what they want, which they may or may not receive and respond to while I'm still available to actually answer their question.

What's more likely is that they won't receive the message right away, and when they finally do get it and respond, I probably won't be staring at messages anymore, so there will probably be another delay, only to FINALLY reach the point we could have been at initially if the other person had just started with asking the question.

That's the delay on both sides that is needlessly introduced by sending a message with no value.

[supermatt]

So the problem you are more concerned with is delaying giving an answer to a question that hasn’t been asked? How does that affect your own productivity?

Even if I get a question directly, my first response is asking if they still need assistance rather than me spending the time to investigate myself.

Maybe it depends on what you actually do for a living. In the capacity where I use chat, I am working in software with other software engineers, so it’s quite normal for people to ask questions which they later resolve themselves if they don’t get immediate assistance. I guess in a managerial capacity it may be different.