Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by solumunus 822 days ago
People need to stop focusing on “historical standards”. For better or worse, retail entering the market en masse (often with options trading) has created a new standard. The market over the last 10 years is the new normal, the smart people have worked this out and are making huge returns. TSLA at its peak had a WAY higher PE than NVDA does now, and NVDA is just as popular, with even stronger fundamentals.
1 comments
TheAlchemist 822 days ago
For better or worse, human psychology doesn't change that much - those historical standards very much apply today.

For us, older folks, we've seen this 'new normal' several times already - it will end up as usual. There are no free lunches and as it appears to me that have not entered any permanently high plateau.

It's even quite funny that ~100 years ago, we've had the previous big pandemic, and the biggest stock market crash. Epidemic of this century is done, now waiting for the second part !

link
solumunus 822 days ago
No, that’s objectively wrong. You simply haven’t seen retail involvement in the market on this level before, not even close. It’s a new precedent, the market has changed.

To clarify, I’m not saying NVDA won’t crash from here or bear markets no longer exist. I’m simply saying that historic PE valuations are a poor metric for assessing the potential of a stock in todays market conditions.

link
TheAlchemist 822 days ago
Well, if you use the word "objectively", I would expect some numbers to back it up.

Yes, it's probably the first time that retail is allowed to trade options. But it's not the first time that retail is all in in stocks. I've tried to find a funny number to back it up - just check the Wiki on 1929 crash - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Crash_of_1929 - there was more money lent to 'small investors' so they can buy on margin ... than the entire amount of currency circulating at the time.

On average, all those retail guys will loose money - that's the sad truth. In the long term, the stocks simply follow the earnings - all other movements around this trends are pretty much a zero sum game - and most skilled operators are not loosing money in that game.

Price to earning ratio is just the number of years the company 'pays for itself' if you buy it. PER at 40s for big chunks of main indexes mean that either there will be tremendous progress in the economy that will boost the earnings or people are hoping to resell to a bigger fool.

Note: I work in finance, and I very much see the retail involvement in stocks. Hedge Funds and banks, are making a ton of money out of them, that's for sure.

link