|
|
|
|
|
by nerdponx
826 days ago
|
|
It's their point, and it's a good one, but I think they're somewhat overstating how common power-law data is; it probably varies a lot by field of study. And at least the logarithm of a power-law variable can help bring it back closer to the world of sanity. Plus, there are plenty of fields where nonparametric tests of medians are accepted standard practice. |
|
So suppose we ask, what is our confidence in X? (rather than X); and then, what is our confidence in the model by which we give confidences in X (ie., the model risk); and so on...
In practice, what we want to model is the appropriate confidence, not an actual prediction (bunk). So we are very often screwed.
Statistics is an illusion.