[notfed]

Would this be more correctly called a CSS "stylesheet"?

Calling it a "CSS framework" really sent me in a loop trying to figure out what "framework" means.

[geek_at]

Modern CSS stylesheets include configurability via CSS variables on the root element so maybe that's where the "framework" comes from.

Also note: This project looks like an even more minimized version of PicoCSS [1]

[1] https://picocss.com/

[lf-non]

Oh pico looks very nice - and something I am likely to actually use. concrete is a bit too minimal for me.

I like the concept of classess css but most of the solutions I looked at (before pico) were just not very pleasing oob.

[louismerlin]

Very good point, I modified the page. The project started-out non-classless, so the term was more appropriate back then.

[krsdcbl]

the somewhat lost term "boilerplate" comes to mind

[bestest]

What you said is literally "Cascading Style Sheets stylesheet". Stick with "framework".

[notfed]

Even W3C calls them "CSS stylesheets", it's pretty standard. It only sounds weird if you expand the acronym.

[noduerme]

Why? Would you call a DVD disc a spaceship?

[bestest]

Of course not. By I wouldn't say "DVD disc" because it's the same as "Digital Video Disc disc".