|
|
|
|
|
by tgflynn
5160 days ago
|
|
But what if 10% improvement means 10 M$/year ? Anyway I think there are many applications where getting the absolute best performance isn't as important as finding the problem, figuring out how to apply a machine learning model to it (which includes getting the necessary training data) then training an off the shelf mode. The later of these may take a day or less, the other phases may well require both more thought and more effort. |
|
But that means you already have a really significant business that makes ~300 M$ per year. And you manage to increase it just by peanuts (relatively speaking).
And there is inflation in economy, and the alternative costs of not investing such a huge sum or part of in Apple stocks (for example) during those years.
My point explained better:
The startup success of getting from zero to millions just because of clever ML/data-science/statistics is something to be respected and admired. But for already big-business all this big-data buzz might provide just minor enhancement opportunities at best.