|
|
|
|
|
by kds
5166 days ago
|
|
10% increase in 3 years translates to around. 3.3% yearly growth rate. So in your example the 3.3% increase would be that 10M$ => so 1% of your annual business revenue is 10/3.3 or just above 3M$. But that means you already have a really significant business that makes ~300 M$ per year. And you manage to increase it just by peanuts (relatively speaking). And there is inflation in economy, and the alternative costs of not investing such a huge sum or part of in Apple stocks (for example) during those years. My point explained better: The startup success of getting from zero to millions just because of clever ML/data-science/statistics is something to be respected and admired. But for already big-business all this big-data buzz might provide just minor enhancement opportunities at best. |
|
If you actually have a machine learning application that increases annual revenue by 10% and your initial annual revenue is $300M (like in the example) and your profit margin is 50% then (neglecting the $1M cost of the model because it's small and amortized over many years) your annual profits go from $150M to $180M which is a 20% increase. I don't think that is a number to yawn about.
On your last point I actually think the opposite is true. The larger a company's operations the more potential cost savings there are. If profit margins are slim, as they are in many industries, the effect on earnings of relatively small cost savings or revenue increases can be large indeed.