mm/dd/yyyy is the most common format in the US. When speaking, I might say December 5, 2023, and this format matches that.
dd/mm/yyyy isn't objectively better IMO. It's what you're used to, making it easier for you to read. It's not what I'm used to, making it harder for me to read.
dd.mm.yyyy is better because it’s in an order, but that’s besides the point. If lots of native English speakers (Americans) use one way, and lots (U.K. and bros) use another, the only logical thing to do is use the unambiguous one (yyyy.mm.dd).
People who use mm.dd.yyyy in English text with no indication that they’re American, writing for Americans, have no place on this planet. Joking not joking.
DD/MM/YYYY vs MM/DD/YYYY each have pros and cons. I don't think we can objectively say 1 is better than the other. I agree YYYY-MM-DD is best. The standard is YYYY-MM-DD, not YYYY.MM.DD, so the dashed version is better than the dot version.
>People who use mm.dd.yyyy in English text with no indication that they’re American, writing for Americans, have no place on this planet. Joking not joking.
The same would apply to dd.mm.yyyy or dd/mm/yyyy with people who don't indicate what country they're from. A few other countries use DD/MM/YYYY:
> the dashed version is better than the dot version
:) yeah I'm fine with either. Just typed with dots out of habit.
> The same would apply to dd.mm.yyyy or dd/mm/yyyy with people who don't indicate what country they're from. A few other countries use DD/MM/YYYY
I thought maybe that was a typo and you meant "A few other countries use MM/DD/YYYY"? But then I looked on that page and only saw a few places that use a variety. Usually when a country uses multiple standards for anything, it's a sign that one of them is "token". For example English is one of two official languages in India:
I come from a dd/mm/yyyy country, but you can’t say mm/dd/yyyy is completely illogical.