|
|
|
|
|
by ghusto
896 days ago
|
|
dd.mm.yyyy is better because it’s in an order, but that’s besides the point. If lots of native English speakers (Americans) use one way, and lots (U.K. and bros) use another, the only logical thing to do is use the unambiguous one (yyyy.mm.dd). People who use mm.dd.yyyy in English text with no indication that they’re American, writing for Americans, have no place on this planet. Joking not joking. |
|
DD/MM/YYYY vs MM/DD/YYYY each have pros and cons. I don't think we can objectively say 1 is better than the other. I agree YYYY-MM-DD is best. The standard is YYYY-MM-DD, not YYYY.MM.DD, so the dashed version is better than the dot version.
>People who use mm.dd.yyyy in English text with no indication that they’re American, writing for Americans, have no place on this planet. Joking not joking.
The same would apply to dd.mm.yyyy or dd/mm/yyyy with people who don't indicate what country they're from. A few other countries use DD/MM/YYYY:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format_by_country