|
|
|
|
|
|
by batista
5174 days ago
|
|
|
>Apple is trying to move from being the cool kids counter-culture creative types alternative to the PC to being the corporate acceptable alternative to the Blackberry.
A story about karmasutra apps or ifart in the WSJ could cause a CEO to change their mind about allowing users to use their iPhone on the corp network. Only this has nothing to do with it. iOS made inroads into the enterprise DESPITE the plethora of fart apps, Kama Sutra apps and such stuff. Apple could care less about the hypothetical CEO you mention --not that 99.9% of CEOs would care about the presence of Kama Sutra apps in the app store when considering allowing the iPhone or not. Mostly things like: employes and managers like to use it, it delivers a business advantage, we can deliver apps for our corporation in that platform. |
|
|
The old fringe player Apple could - the new $trillion corporate Apple might "think different".
Remember once upon a time Microsoft was a cool fashionable young persons software company fighting against the established corporate monopolies
I'm sure this was just a new employee who was probably still in high-school when the Appstore launched and thinks anything not on the front page of reddit is ancient. But it does show a certain attitude inside Apple. Iconoclast thinking different and "we can do no wrong" is great when it's Jobs deciding you only need one mouse button - it's different when it becomes an unwillingness to even talk to your customers and users.