|
|
|
|
|
by iodbh
936 days ago
|
|
Just leaving this here to contrast with the “murder tech good” vibe. If your greatest achievement ended up with a bunch of people dead - maybe there would have been more utility in self-destruction. If you feel like defending cool missile tech to avoid offending a potential juicy customer - maybe you need to get your family bombed and remember that “skin in the game” can be literal. If you think that violence is necessary - maybe you need to be in situation where violence is a possible outcome to remember no one wants it. Everyone deserves the receiving end of their designs. |
|
In other words, American Indians who were proud of their spears and axes should instead have embraced self-destruction.
Yikes.
My ancestors were vikings. Should their victims also have embraced self-destruction rather than make the best weapons they could to defend themselves from the vikings?
> maybe you need to be in situation where violence is a possible outcome to remember no one wants it.
Tell me more about how the vikings "didn't want violence"?