Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hiatus 963 days ago
I think that is 3 million now, not 3 million by the end of the retirement period.
1 comments

If we assume they have three million now, in 40 years when they have 20 years of retirement left, assuming it sees a 5% annual rate of return, they will have $21 million.

Are you suggesting that they actually need ~$21 million for a 20 year retirement?

I'm saying the article is saying they need 3 million before entering retirement.
Yes, that's right. Assuming a typical lifespan, they will have 20 years left in ~40 years. Assuming a 2% inflation rate, $3 million in 40 years is equivalent to ~$600,000 today. A 60 year old holding $600,000 today does not seem like that high of a bar.
> A 60 year old holding $600,000 today does not seem like that high of a bar.

Gen Z isn't 60 years old today. They don't have 600k, and for them, it is a high bar.

That's right. They have ~40 years left to acquire $3 million before they have 20 years left, assuming the typical human lifespan. Which, adjusted for inflation, is the same as someone who saved $600,000 over the past 40 years.
So, like, not so many people, and even less going forward?

https://fortune.com/recommends/banking/57-percent-of-america...

He means the article is saying they will need $3 million in today's dollars to retire
The needs of retirement should scale with inflation, so that means you also need $3 million today (in today's dollars) – which is rather high. $600,000 is not too far off what is the minimum recommended amount of saving to retire for 20 years on today, so it seems they simply adjusted that figure for inflation and then forgot that the income used to build up those savings also goes up with inflation.
$600,000 for 20 years is 30K per year. They'd get by on those for the next 20 years if they were to retire today?