[theclansman]

I don't understand what are these immense benefits, to catch more criminals? Since when has throwing more people in jail reduced crime? I guess this would stop someone who is plotting a murder but a school shooting is gonna happen either way.

[TFortunato]

Parent post said "science/health", nothing about preventing crime or jailing more people

[ballenf]

I don't know about "throwing people in jail", but putting criminals in jail certainly reduces crime rates. As opposed to not putting convicted criminals in jail.

But we hardly need advanced DNA profiling to catch 99.9% of criminals (versus just standard DNA matching).

[JadeNB]

> I don't know about "throwing people in jail", but putting criminals in jail certainly reduces crime rates.

That's the sort of statement that seems plausible, and even intuitive, but probably needs a citation. It wouldn't wholly surprise me if it were true, though at moral and economic cost; but it would surprise me even less if it were false.

[edgyquant]

It’s literally self evident that a person in jail can’t commit crimes on the outside. The statement itself contains all the axioms you need, citations are not something required here. It’s like saying a dead baker reduces the amount of bread in a town for that day and you asking for a source

[JadeNB]

> It’s literally self evident that a person in jail can’t commit crimes on the outside. The statement itself contains all the axioms you need, citations are not something required here. It’s like saying a dead baker reduces the amount of bread in a town for that day and you asking for a source

You didn't say "reduces the crime rate outside of prison." I assumed that's what you meant, but it's not clear that ignoring the crime rate inside prison is a reasonable statistic.

People in prison also, presumably, eventually get out, and a claim that prison officials can accurately deduce the likelihood of recidivism, and whether it has been decreased rather than increased by time in prison, is far from clear.

Finally, putting lots of people in prison has an effect on people outside of prison. For example, it is possible—though, again, I don't know; citations are needed—that high incarceration rates lead to more crime outside, since, if a member of a community has a good chance of going to prison whether or not they commit a crime, then prison can cease to have a meaningful deterrent effect in that community.

[DontchaKnowit]

Well if the data is being sold to drug companies, one massive benefit that is glarinly obvious is that drug companies may mow have an enormously valuable dataset for developing new medical technologies.

Im as anti-dna info-sharing as anybody, and I wont begiving 23andme a sample ever, but this is admitedly probably a pretty good thing. Even if it does ultimately serve to enrich some mega corps,consumers will probably get some amazing new treatments/therapies/medicines out of the deal.