Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by photonbucket 970 days ago
It's also not effective. Mainstream people are never going to talk about 'X' or 'Meta' but will just stick with the old names
1 comments

Journalists seem to talk about "X, the service formerly known as Twitter" or similar - I guess they have to call the company by its official name but also want people to know what they're talking about
In the end, it has the same result as "the artist, formerly known as Prince".
Closest I could find in Unicode is Ƭ̵̬̊
You're just missing the correct font support https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/04/princes-legendary-fl...
If I were writing about it as a journalist I would just refer to it as Twitter.com.
The major media outlets have clearly missed the chance to just call it x-twitter!
Editors & style guides don't tend to give you that choice.
Some call it Xitter (/shiˈtter/).
> Some call it Xitter (/shiˈtter/).

Shouldn't that be pronounced Kitter or Chitter?

No?

The only official pronunciation of X in English is "ks", and there are many languages that use X for many different sounds. Shitter is appropriate, I think some Spanish dialects might read it that way.

I don't think X as "sh" in Spanish exists (but I could be wrong). But Mandarin as transcribed in pinyin has it.

Also in English x is pronounced as z at the beginning of some Greek-derived words like Xerox and xylophone.

Where you can xit x-crements