> artificial diversity just creates divided teams.
Why do you consider diversity to be "artificial"? It's actually lack of diversity that's artificial.
Forget about gender and ethnicity for a second; what about the lack of age diversity in tech, and the rampant age discrimination? Oh, but it's a "meritocracy", and younger people are just "better", right? (See "Using terribly thin fonts with low contrast colors leading to unreadable websites." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38068697)
Why not? And what would?
> artificial diversity just creates divided teams.
Why do you consider diversity to be "artificial"? It's actually lack of diversity that's artificial.
Forget about gender and ethnicity for a second; what about the lack of age diversity in tech, and the rampant age discrimination? Oh, but it's a "meritocracy", and younger people are just "better", right? (See "Using terribly thin fonts with low contrast colors leading to unreadable websites." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38068697)