Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nunez 977 days ago
This is an appropriate amount of rage for a standup that went too long.

And, I agree with the author; most stories in most sprints never get done (for a million reasons, 999,999 of them foundational) and just roll over from sprint to sprint to sprint until the inevitable collapse of the company (via M&A).

1 comments

I don't think the rage is totally uncalled for. A 15 minute standup on a 5 person team is actually over a full hour lost. Put another way, a company with 50 engineers doing 15 minute standup every day is over 400 work days of lost productivity each year - basically 2 engineers extra.

Assuming that stand-ups result in increased productivity, and that's a big assumption (likely exactly the opposite to the reality), have you really tallied up how much it's making vs how much it's costing?

It certainly makes me mad.

Exactly! Standups are so wasteful, I cannot believe companies actually think they are okay. This from the article really sums it up:

> Which absolute fucking maniac in this room decided that the most sensible thing to do in a culture where everyone has way too many meetings was schedule recurring meetings every day?

GP said the rage was appropriate. I think you responded as if GP said the rage was inappropriate. Or did I miss an edit?
Potentially dyslexia on my part.