| One thing I disagree with is saying that EMAI is objective. There's no machine learning model that is truly objective. They're all biased due to their, usually human generated, datasets. It's impossible to account sufficiently for every scenario in a training set, so these models just give an objective veneer to the biases of those that created the dataset. This phenomena is well documented with predictive models for crime. Many arrests happen in low-income areas.
The data on arrests skew towards those areas.
The predictive models are trained on that data.
Using that data, police make more arrests in low income areas.
Those arrests get added to the data set
Rinse and repeat. Replace police, arrests, and low-income with anything and it's still true For example: Company Leadership, promotions, race |
Unintentional feedback loop amplifying the thing being measured is a problem, yes, but it doesn't stem from predictions themselves - it's decisions and actions informed by the predictions that can amplify the problem instead of reducing it.