[thriftwy]

Yes, we do absolutely need to put things in space and have computers, because it is the way to progress and see what's next possible in this setting, and then decide what to do while having even more opportunities and options.

If we are not doing that we are not sentient species but a kind of animal that happens to speak and use some rudimentary tools.

[fodkodrasz]

It is an interesting take, especially as many progress-obsessed people also complain about global warming, pollution, eradication of species, deforestation, etc. Is that progress?

Also those "non-sentinent animals with rudimentary tools" did have quite some culture, and technology. Not in today's sense of course: no personalized advertisements with goebbelsian tricks to trick people into wasting even more resources and destroying our environment even more. They only made rudimentary tools like composite bows, tools for horse riding and taking care of animals, etc.

I'm also sad to hear that people before 1960 were just a kind of animals in your opinion, and if that is the measure, many people around the world still are.

[thriftwy]

Many people before 1960 were human because they excercised curiousity and wanted to go forth.

Many people today are trying to return to animal state, like you are contemplating it.

An illegal immigrant crossing the sea for better living is more human than a developed country suburban dweller trying to learn carbon neutral living.

[fodkodrasz]

How is a developed country suburban dweller trying to learn carbon neutral living not exercising its curiosity. Isn't learning that?

How do you know we were always going forward in the right direction? How do you know sometimes we don't need to go back? DDT? CFC gases? There lots of examples even from the recent times.

Why do you think people in the pastoral civilizations didn't exercise their curiosity? Just because they didn't built things you fancy? Didn't they create things, like art, just for the sake of beauty? Isn't that a kind of exercising curiosity, Didn't they develop and learn methods to live in harsh environments, to use the plants as medicine, etc. Isn't that kind of learning valuable, because it does not lead (as quickly) to creation machines doing fancy flashing stuff? they were living, and progressing in a different pace in possibly different directions.

Your attitude is not simply colonialist, but also lack respect for many forms of knowledge, only for these are not on the modern technocratic urbanite's tool-belt makes it especially narrow-minded.

[thriftwy]

We do not have to use DDT till the end of times, but we do have to try newer and newer things. Including carbon neutral living, it's just that it looks more like pointless religious practice now.

Art is great. Let's always be trying to discover newer forms of art.

It turns out their way of progressing did not bear friut and peasant societies were much faster. That's life.

[fodkodrasz]

Maybe we should not rush to start large scale application of every and each fad, in the name of progress, without any thought on wider consequences.

Why are you only obsessed with new things? Why cannot the legacy be cultivated?

It turns out that pastoral life did bear its fruits, you simply dismiss those. For one, the most important fruit: those people are still around. No that is life, not "progress for the sake of progress".

[thriftwy]

I absolutely agree with you, we do not need to do anything in the name of progress.

Legacy absolutely should be cultivated and remembered. But never at the cost of rejecting further motion.

Pastoral life was great why it was going on (even remembering all the raids and slavery stuff), but then it could not go on anymore since peasants learned how to build walls and posts and forts. And had a good reason to do so.