[tristan9]

> What happens when you log an attack from a device that is attacking you from a school or business WiFi network? Block the whole IP forever?

No, but for a day perhaps.

> What if the user is on a CGNAT. Are you going to block the edge proxy for that entire ISP?

Maybe. If the ISP doesn’t bother doing anything about it (which is THEIR job, not mine as a website operator).

If the ISP can’t be arsed to do their job, why am I supposed to care about them at all?

> What if you're getting hit from a residential connection that gets a new rotated IP every couple of weeks? Block whoever gets that IP from now on?

Same as the CGNAT one. It’s the ISP’s job to handle their misbehaving customers.

If they refuse to do it and get complaints from their other customers that they’re getting blocked, maybe they’ll actually get to it.

> Your solution doesn't stop attacks. It just stops regular users.

No. It puts pressure on the ISPs to finally stop whining loudly when they receive an attack while closing their eyes on any attack originating from their network.

This is not sustainable.

[zelon88]

Trust me when I say that you don't want the ISP's to inspect web traffic. That is not how to solve this. That is costly for the ISP and will drive up costs. It also makes supporting a website impossible. The ISP is assumed by all parties to be impartial. That assumption is required for the internet to be operational. Sure it might function your way, but it would be impossible to support.

And maybe Facebook and Google are big enough to push around the ISP's, but they are the only ones. Nobody will bat an eyelash if 15,000 Comcast users in Phoenix AZ can access your hokey-pokey website. Comcast doesn't care. The users won't blame their ISP. They will blame you, or whoever owns the hokey-pokey website. If you want traffic, you need to be equipped to handle traffic. You are the one with the internet facing infrastructure.

You are the one blocking traffic. Not the ISP. That is how it should be. The ISP should be impartial. You pay for connectivity. Consider yourself connected. For better or for worse. You are responsible for what you put onto that connection.

[tristan9]

> Trust me when I say that you don't want the ISP's to inspect web traffic.

They do already. DPI on port 53 for DNS blocks or SNI inspection are common place. So are IP blocks.

> If you want traffic, you need to be equipped to handle traffic. You are the one with the internet facing infrastructure.

Slightly misleading wording here. More accurately your point is: « you want to run a website? Better have the infra to support traffic spikes comparable to that of a tech giant ». 400M rps would cost an unfathomable amount of money to be able to handle even just while dropping all packets.

> And maybe Facebook and Google are big enough to push around the ISP's, but they are the only ones. Nobody will bat an eyelash if 15,000 Comcast users in Phoenix AZ can access your hokey-pokey website.

Obviously yes. Too bad it’s better business for everyone to say nothing and just recommend you use their product.

[mrweasel]

ISP needs to start taking much more responsibility, currently they do not care or choose not to care to avoid having to deal with upset customers.

The fact that millions, if no more, devices can continue to access the internet regardless of how long they are compromised, is just crazy. I get that it put more responsibility upon end users to secure their devices, if they otherwise run the risk of get thrown of the internet, but I currently fail to see other options. Our device security still isn't good enough that we can just use them with reckless abandonment.

Any "solution" that attempts to fix the problem of increasing DDoS attacks and their damage that doesn't address the issue of compromised devices being allowed to roam free on the internet is a band aid at best.

And I can almost hear people complain that I'm arguing to throw compromised IoT, SCADA and monitoring devices of the internet, and yes I am. None of these things have any business being exposed to the public internet anyway.

[lazide]

Either the ISPs are common carriers that follow some sort of basic rules, or they try to make people happy and end up stepping all over people randomly.

Currently there are zero rules (outside of a ISP ToS maybe) that forbids what you’re talking about. Pretty much anywhere I think? Unless you know of a law against having a infected or out of date computer connected to the internet?

There really is no way to have both. The current situation, they generally only deal with problem cases that get reported to them. And I doubt anyone is going to bother doing so for the 20k machines in this attack.

[acedTrex]

It is not an ISPs job to analyze traffic patterns and attempt to stop the bad ones. Thats like saying its the job of the road crews to stop speeders

[mrweasel]

So who else? My proposal would be to have companies like Google, Microsoft, Amazon and hosting providers be able to report sources of DDoS attack to the ISPs who can then identify the customer and let the customer know that they have a week to fix the issue or lose connectivity.

[zelon88]

That is terrifying.

Let Google, Amazon, and Apple decide who gets to use the internet and who gets put into a list.

That is way worse than giving Google the W3C. That is literally just handing them the internet and making everybody else on it subservient to Google.

[axus]

Or that it's the ISP's job to cut off accounts that are downloading copyrighted works, or hashing cryptocurrency without paying taxes, etc.

It would be nice if the cell phone provider could send a text message reporting the problem. But how to distinguish it from spam?

[rplnt]

> > What happens when you log an attack from a device that is attacking you from a school or business WiFi network? Block the whole IP forever?

> No, but for a day perhaps.

Then that's also a DDoS attack vector.