Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bambax 991 days ago
It's exactly like this. Publishers get a range, and do whatever they want with it.

Also, some agencies sell the numbers range to publishers (I believe the US is in that case) and others give them away at no cost (France). As a result, some small publishers get ISBNs from more liberal agencies than their own country: one can never be 100% sure a French ISBN matches a French publisher for example.

It's also possible some publishers re-use old numbers or affix the same number to different releases/editions of a book.

It's a mess.

But a global centralized system would probably be way worse, so we have to live with that mess.
1 comments
amelius 991 days ago
Why not use UUIDs?

People never enter ISBNs manually, anyways. So it might as well be longer string. Or a QR code.

link
dwringer 991 days ago
As someone who's worked in the field of used books, I can say from personal experience that's not quite true. It's pretty common to have to type in an ISBN for a variety of reasons. Many times the barcodes have been covered up or defaced, and many publications don't have barcodes in the first place.
link
amelius 991 days ago
It was true, for sure. But the question is, is it still true?
link
bambax 991 days ago
Schools often ask for a specific edition of a classic book and the only way to be reasonably sure you're buying the correct one is to search by ISBN.
link
amelius 991 days ago
Well, just copy and paste from the email you got from school.

I mean, if IT can do anything, it is to solve this problem.

link
greenie_beans 991 days ago
same
link
sevenseventen 989 days ago
The point is not just to have universally unique identifiers, but to collect common metadata that's associated with the identifiers. Like this:

https://www.bowker.com/siteassets/files/pdf-files/datasubmis...

Since this is the second time I've mentioned Bowker, let me just say that I do not and have never worked for them or with them, although I did meet with their reps several times when I worked in a different part of digital publishing. It's just that they're inescapable when you're talking about ISBNs.

link
layer8 991 days ago
ISBNs contain a check digit, to prevent typos. So you’d have to invent a new format.
link