|
|
|
|
|
by hoagsobject
1003 days ago
|
|
Article claims that SSRI are overpresribed, and that only 15% derive any benefit. To me it seems that people who don't need it and were over-prescribed the drug do not derive any benefit. But it does not mean that drug efficiency is 15%. It's like giving aspirin to people without headache, and claim that aspirin does not work. |
|
FYI, psychiatrists don't (can't) really check to see whether the drugs are "helping". As long as you're staying out of the hospital, not going fucking nuts in their face, and you're not screaming about ten side effects, they'll keep you on all the ineffective drugs you can afford. (n.b. be careful about mentioning side effects; that's a good way to get bonus drugs.)
Your aspirin analogy is perspicacious. I often struggle with use of pain relievers, because how can I know that they've relieved any pain, or my pain just subsided somewhat coincidentally? I was in ER for kidney stones, for example, and the pain was excruciating and I vomited and writhed around, so they gave me an IV dose of "NSAIDs on CRACK!" as the nurse so aptly and professionally described it. Within 10 minutes my pain was receding rapidly. I had no lingering complaints, long after it would've worn off. So, correlation or causation?
Conversely, I've never perceived even the slightest relief from OTC pain meds, and I've run the gamut. Experimenting with Bali Red Kratom this year.