|
|
|
|
|
by cutemonster
995 days ago
|
|
Aha, so they get paid the same, regardless of if their research works or not. And possibly some bonuses if things go well for the company? And if they all the time do nothing useful and manipulate data, they get fired? But that's different from a PhD student -- they're not embedded in any organization that would notice if the research works or not? Maybe if the universities partnered somehow with different companies, and the researchers got extra compensation if a company decided to make real world use of the research? (On top of some base salary) But who would determine if a company had made use of a certain research paper? What would the company gain, by keeping track and reporting back? Maybe more good research (but I'd guess few companies would be that much forward-looking?) |
|
I don't know. Is that speculation on your part, or something you figured out?
> But who would determine if a company had made use of a certain research paper? What would the company gain, by keeping track and reporting back? Maybe more good research
> (but I'd guess few companies would be that much forward-looking?)
That's why I am saying we should look what real companies are actually doing already in reality. We might have to leave our armchairs for that.