[eru]

> Aha, so they get paid the same, regardless of if their research works or not.

I don't know. Is that speculation on your part, or something you figured out?

> But who would determine if a company had made use of a certain research paper? What would the company gain, by keeping track and reporting back? Maybe more good research

> (but I'd guess few companies would be that much forward-looking?)

That's why I am saying we should look what real companies are actually doing already in reality. We might have to leave our armchairs for that.

[cutemonster]

> Is that speculation on your part, or something you figured out

That's just normal monthly wages, how things usually work.

> look what real companies are actually doing already

But you can't look at what companies are doing now, to find out if new research is useful? The companies can't yet have started doing the things that any new & good research enables (since it wasn't known before).

Could take years until they make use of the research

(But maybe you meant something else)

[eru]

I mean look at what companies have been doing in the past to organise and incentivise research, and see what worked.

Look at what processes worked (and didn't work!). Not at what specific inventions worked.

[cutemonster]

If you have any books or articles you like related to that, it'd be interesting to hear :-)

(Research by Google about psychological safety comes to my mind.)