|
|
|
|
|
by danaris
1000 days ago
|
|
> But they haven't slowed down. But...they have. How many stories have there been about how GPT-3 and GPT-4 have gotten worse over the period they've been out? And it's not like we got GPT-3, and then GPT-4, and then, within the same time frame, GPT-5 with a similar increase in quality. Sure, people are working on more improvements, but they're not here yet, and while that doesn't mean they will never come, it does mean that, compared to what appeared to be a rapid rush of "AI" progress, things have slowed down. "Progress is still being made" and "progress has slowed down compared to the speed that generated all the hype" are not incompatible statements. |
|
They are experimenting with trade offs. In this case, things like appropriateness, less overconfidence, etc.
That isn’t indicative of any slowdown.
> Sure, people are working on more improvements, but they're not here yet, and while that doesn't mean they will never come, it does mean that, compared to what appeared to be a rapid rush of "AI" progress, things have slowed down.
I don’t follow.
People and teams keep publishing and releasing new techniques but big projects don’t release major updates as quickly.
How are your arguments more relevant to GPT4 than they would have been for GPT3? Earlier models?