|
|
|
|
|
by criddell
1042 days ago
|
|
> improper terminology But in English, there is no central authority for determining correctness. For the general public, the meaning of words and phrases is entirely determined by usage. In a lecture hall, courtroom, or research lab, definitions may be more precise. |
|
That no one is appointed as bearer of the authority does not mean that randomness is as valid as the authoritative facts behind a term.
Only one hour ago I accidentally found myself in front of a definition on a dictionary: «anon (adv.): late Old English Old English anon, earlier on an, literally "into one" [...] By gradual misuse, "soon, in a little while" (1520s)». Repeat: «By gradual misuse». Linguists recognize proper and improper.
> For the general public
But the general public has little importance. We are not necessarily speaking its language. On the contrary... Here we often speak as specialists (supposedly).
There is little use in reapplying 'cube' to something that hardly deserves the name. People do: this does not mean that we should follow. And potentially, with that, lose discrimination. Like, in this context, an awareness about the whole context of AI, replaced by some fog that on the contrary we work to dissipate.