[mdp2021]

> Randomness?

You were talking about «central authority for determining correctness». I replied that no authority does not mean that there is no "more or less wrong or right".

> Google calls their Bard LLM an AI

It is a .com :) , what did you expect?

[criddell]

> I replied that no authority does not mean that there is no "more or less wrong or right".

I never said there isn't right or wrong, only that what is correct is determined by broad usage.

> It is a .com :) , what did you expect?

Actually, it's a .google

https://ai.google/discover/generativeai

[mdp2021]

> I never said there isn't right or wrong, only that what is correct is determined by broad usage

Others - like us - call "correct" what seems to be "more right". In the context, I proposed that calling LLMs AI has improper sides - substantially, irregardless of the number of people who would adhere to that use, and which I suspect do so mostly out of inattention.

> Actually, it's a .google

Yes, but substantially, what I meant is that of course a commercial entity («.com») is using a language that lures glamorously, "sales oriented", before precision.