Several of the more useless middle managers I deal with are suddenly writing these long emails that are almost certainly edited GPT generated crap. You can pretty easily generate questions or other things to bog people down with. It’s comical.
I'm a terrible writer so I'm hoping chat GPT will allow me to write better emails to support my teams.
I could also see use cases to write better reviews. I've experimented with adding my 1:1 notes and coming up with a yearlong summary. The result was really great and neatly summarized a person's accomplishments.
One interesting strategy was to ask chat gpt to summarize a communication in a few ways like. I'm skeptical of this person's ideas, what other alternatives to this thought could be? Can you give me other perspectives? The results were interesting and helpful.
My friend, who decided to become a manager early in his career, and I had a discussion on this. He thinks that one key reason for management is due to inefficiency in communication. With AI, individuals can achieve more than they could before. What can only be done by a team of individuals with different skills can be done by a single person in the future. Hence the need for management will decrease.
He predicted, in the future, there will be a few mega companies that develop foundational technologies and millions indie or small businesses (without management) built around those technologies.
We later saw this blog post that shares the same view.
The day that I can ask an AI to analyze my team's history of activity in git & jira and then suggest actionable changes that would improve productivity and observability for team members and for the team is the day that I can semi-retire and spend my afternoons at the beach.
i am developing a tool for your semi-retirement, its not there yet but if you are interested in trying it and giving me feedback, i can help you semi-retire sooner :-) . checkout the tool here https://gitimprove.com
Why would anyone fire a manager because your tool is available now?
Did I get it right it creates charts for the types of issues your team has, the time spent on them and makes a decision to fire/hire more people? Is that all managers do? You don't even need AI for that.
Sorry to be blunt and I don't mean the tool is bad. I'm replying in the context in which it's being discussed (making managers unnecessary).
Hopefully it will eliminate all the boring shit like managing JIRA, giving status updates, and following up with communication tasks. Another large part of my day is also troubleshooting random things, so hopefully AI will benefit my team before I have to get engaged.
I don't think AI poses a risk when it comes to setting engineering priorities and building the roadmap. If it could do that, it could probably just build the entire system anyway.
EMs are there for the human aspect of engineering, so I also doubt it will impact hiring or EM-engineer ratios.
I do expect the bar to being an EM to be higher as the job will be more technical and less project management.
correct.It can only help in analyzing jira and surfacing what could be important, human review would still be required. It can't do anything if people are not responding to communication tasks.
Professional engineering is heavy on licensure requirements and personal responsibility. I'd imagine that professional engineers are likely to use AI to generate scenarios, that they will then evaluate fully before signing off on.