The usb-c connector is rated to 5 Amps (A). Usb-c went up to 20V already. 5A * 20V = 100W (where we are).
We didn't want to change the connector. So we are stuck at 5A. But we can raise voltage & still have some margin. So voltage was raised to 48V. 5A * 48V = 240W.
As for raising the voltage more, it's likely very technically feasible, but probably not, for safety reasons. There are various levels of what is considered safe voltages. Higher voltages have higher ability to injure humans, to cause shock or potentially spark. Voltage is a unit of electrical potential, essentially how bad some juice is desperate to get out. 50V is the "Safe Extra Low Voltage" (SELV) limit for AC. It's actually 120V for DC but 48V/50V has a certain dislodgable-for-now mindshare. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra-low_voltage
Connectors also have limits to their voltage isolation. If you have 1000V that electric potential really wants to get out & will arc across gaps. If there's debris or a worn connector, the threat of say 200V causing some short is much higher.
We probably could go higher. Usb-pd is super safe. When plugged in, it's in a very limited 5V state. This is a high risk moment in the connection life cycle, as pins are sliding into place, but partially connected & likely not aligned fully yet; not having any real voltage applied at this phase is a colossal design win against so so so many power delivery mechanisms in the world. Device & source _after being connected_ then have to negotiate power, on the secured connection. They ongoingly perform bounds checking to make sure the power is flowing in an expected way & will disconnect if out of spec. The connector has good isolation. 120v * 5a would be 600W and is still SELV. Add some thermal protection to the ports to make sure everything's OK there and it's probably going to just work. But any mishaps (ex: puncturing the cable, debris inside the device causing a short) would be more severe/scary. I'd love for some hackers to find out how high our connectors can go. Maybe in lab conditions we can get a usb-c connector doing a couple hundred volts fine. I would be unsurprised. Being safe for the real world though, after wear, and what happens when there is a fault is why we have SELV. But again, SELV says we could go up to 600W on this connector maybe.
One non-concern should be any additional heat, such as on cables & connectors. Since amps are still only 5A, the power loss is actually the same. Pretty great.
> When plugged in, it's in a very limited 5V state.
Depending on what's on the other end, it's actually even better than that would imply most of the time.
If both sides of the cable are in spec-compliant USB-C ports, then the power pins will be left at 0v for the initial connection, and only the CC pins will have a minuscule amount of power coming from the source (charger) - just enough to detect specific levels of resistance on the sink (phone/laptop/etc.) for 5v power and/or negotiate a higher voltage for USB PD.
Once they've established that one side is a source and the other side is a sink, then the source will provide power on the power pins of the cable.
If a USB-C cable is used to connect one charger to another, for example, then the negotiation will fail and neither charger will provide power on the main power pins.
USB-A ports, on the other hand, always provide 5v, so USB-A to USB-C cables always provide 5v on the main power pins.
The reason some cheep chineese electronics with USB-C connectors can only charge with USB-A to USB-C cables, not with USB-C to USB-C cables, is that they skipped the CC pins entirely. I actually modded one device by adding in two half-cent resistors to make it able to charge from a USB-C port: https://www.nfriedly.com/techblog/2021-10-10-v90-usb-c/
> The reason some cheep chineese electronics with USB-C connectors can only charge with USB-A to USB-C cables, not with USB-C to USB-C cables is that they skipped the CC pins entirely.
If anyone has a usb-c pass through adapter that can negotiate for 5v out, please please please share. Ideally for me it'd be a like 3 inch cable that that a male & female connector.
Extra credit if it uses usb-pd to try to ask for 5v 5a.
(these would be incredibly out of spec & could cause damage to systems, but mercy they'd be useful! I find this problem to happen on a bunch of devices, alas not just cheap/rare ones)
Negotiating voltage after being connected avoids the problem of sparking while the connector is being plugged in, but I don't think it helps with avoiding sparking in the process of unplugging the connector? Unless one of the leads is shorter so that is disconnects first and the circuitry can detect that and turn off the power super fast?
You are absolutely correct, and the USB-C specification even has an entire appendix dedicated to the problem. The trick is to reduce the voltage difference until the plug is far enough that a spark is no longer an issue, which means placing an appropriately large capacitor at the Sink side.
It’s designed around 48V and 5A. Higher voltages introduce additional risks around arcing and also get you into different safety regulations and requirements. Above 5A also starts to make cable and connector design difficult for a small connector like USB-C.
Last time I looked at the comms protocol, it seemed possible to request up to 10 amps. I'm not sure there's a physical spec for a matching cable, but there's also no way for a cable to communicate its current limitations.
> there's also no way for a cable to communicate its current limitations
I don't think that's quite right. USB-C cables that support >60W (>3A @ 20V) must have an e-mark, which is a small chip embedded in the cable that identifies it as being able to support specific levels of power, such as 5A @ 20V for 100W or 5A @ 48V for 240W.
Spec-compliant chargers won't supply more than 60W unless the cable has the appropriate e-mark.
Good to know, thanks! I was interested in the comms side and not the cable side since I was considering building a widget that didn't use USB-C as the physical layer but did use PD for power negotiation.
Nothing prevents anyone to use the USB-PD protocol over a different cable and plug (and maybe some do but we don't know it) rated for 10A. It's just so much more practical both for users and when designing to just use off the shelf USB-C (which AIUI has its design rated for 5A) as the physical part.
Thanks! That's exactly why I was looking into the comms side but didn't spend more than a couple moments on the cable side. I was considering building something that had board-to-board connected modules and used PD to negotiate the power between boards.
It's not really the thickness of the cable, is it? The constrained part, that has to stay the same regardless of what cable you buy, is the thickness of the pins on the connector. Where, presumably, any resistive heat from that connection is dumped into the body of the device being charged (just like resistive heat from operating a 1600W space heater with a big, thick extension cable gets dumped into your the electrical box behind the socket it's plugged into.)
The pins go very short way so even if the resistance of them is far higher than a cable they are pretty short to dissipate any significant power. At least from my experience in sketchy connections. But yeah, definitely another limit here
Voltage too, at some point it would just be too close for the voltage and would start arcing.
5 amps is the highest current official USB cables will carry, and 48V is the highest voltage you can generally use as anything more is not considered intrinsically safe to handle -- it's the maximum "low voltage"
USB-C solves the arcing problem in a similar way that CCS (EV chargers) does. It doesn't engage the high voltage pins until a low voltage pilot makes contact.
I'm not sure exactly how USB solves that for disconnecting (CCS locks the connector in) but I imagine the pilot would disconnect first and that would kill the PD pins during disconnect.
Obviously there's stepping up and down happening on both ends up this cable (since it's probably a 19V lithium ion battery in the computer), but at the end of the day you still need to decide on a safe and practical volts*amps number, and then spec the cables and connectors accordingly.
Because you have to size the cables based on amperage. The highest voltage supported by USB-PD is 20V. At 20V to deliver 240W you need 12 amps. That's already a fairly high number. At 300W you'd need 15 amps.
So unless you want to drag around an NEC type cable as thick as one of your fingers, you need to set a limit.
We didn't want to change the connector. So we are stuck at 5A. But we can raise voltage & still have some margin. So voltage was raised to 48V. 5A * 48V = 240W.
As for raising the voltage more, it's likely very technically feasible, but probably not, for safety reasons. There are various levels of what is considered safe voltages. Higher voltages have higher ability to injure humans, to cause shock or potentially spark. Voltage is a unit of electrical potential, essentially how bad some juice is desperate to get out. 50V is the "Safe Extra Low Voltage" (SELV) limit for AC. It's actually 120V for DC but 48V/50V has a certain dislodgable-for-now mindshare. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra-low_voltage
Connectors also have limits to their voltage isolation. If you have 1000V that electric potential really wants to get out & will arc across gaps. If there's debris or a worn connector, the threat of say 200V causing some short is much higher.
We probably could go higher. Usb-pd is super safe. When plugged in, it's in a very limited 5V state. This is a high risk moment in the connection life cycle, as pins are sliding into place, but partially connected & likely not aligned fully yet; not having any real voltage applied at this phase is a colossal design win against so so so many power delivery mechanisms in the world. Device & source _after being connected_ then have to negotiate power, on the secured connection. They ongoingly perform bounds checking to make sure the power is flowing in an expected way & will disconnect if out of spec. The connector has good isolation. 120v * 5a would be 600W and is still SELV. Add some thermal protection to the ports to make sure everything's OK there and it's probably going to just work. But any mishaps (ex: puncturing the cable, debris inside the device causing a short) would be more severe/scary. I'd love for some hackers to find out how high our connectors can go. Maybe in lab conditions we can get a usb-c connector doing a couple hundred volts fine. I would be unsurprised. Being safe for the real world though, after wear, and what happens when there is a fault is why we have SELV. But again, SELV says we could go up to 600W on this connector maybe.
One non-concern should be any additional heat, such as on cables & connectors. Since amps are still only 5A, the power loss is actually the same. Pretty great.