|
|
|
|
|
by crazygringo
1113 days ago
|
|
No, because it's still a for-profit corporation, and one that's taken lots of VC funding and has also been looking to IPO. Owners change, management changes, priorities change, that's what happens in the business world. If you don't think you're taking a major risk, then you're just being naive. (I'm not defending Reddit here, but I am saying anyone should have been planning for this highly probable outcome.) |
|
It's well known that most online communities are 1% super-contributors, 9% modest contributors, and 90% lurkers/occasional contributors.
"Third party app users" are far more likely to be 1% and 9% users. They're committed to the platform enough that they're willing to seek out or even make software to improve their experience on it. The lurkers will just download the official app if it's the top match in the App Store and deal with the inconveniences.
So if you take that away, you disproportionately punish your most valuable users. Note I say "valuable" not in terms of "they click a lot of ads", but rather "they bring the content that makes the other 90% of users stick around and click ads."
It feels like a bar cancelling "Free Drinks Ladies' Night" because they figure that the 10 female patrons will buy 20 bottles of beer, then acting surprised when the 50 men who would come in to hit on them (and buy four beers each) don't show.