There's an area of memory into which variables with automatic storage duration are allocated at implementation-defined addrs, at any point exactly those variables have addresses.
> That doesn't sound like it lets me increment any stack address I want and store into the resulting pointer.
Why not?
> And are return values still on the same stack?
Other implementation-defined things might have addresses too, those things just aren't variables. I think you might be able to still allow inlining without UB if you make it implementation-defined per call-site what other things might get addresses.
That doesn't sound like it lets me increment any stack address I want and store into the resulting pointer.
And are return values still on the same stack? I probably should have said I meant the traditional kind of C stack.