|
|
|
|
|
|
by remexre
1110 days ago
|
|
|
> That doesn't sound like it lets me increment any stack address I want and store into the resulting pointer. Why not? > And are return values still on the same stack? Other implementation-defined things might have addresses too, those things just aren't variables. I think you might be able to still allow inlining without UB if you make it implementation-defined per call-site what other things might get addresses. |
|
|
At this point the conversation has completely converged so I'm only going to reply over here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36169808