Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by SoftTalker 1121 days ago
Gemtext seems to be more like wanting to be an online typewriter. Back when typewriters were used to write documents, there was one typeface and font, and no hyperlinks or images. To reference other documents you could use footnotes or a bibliography. Margins and line spacing (except maybe for block-quotes) were fixed. A lot of useful information was communicated in this format, but it does seem a bit too austere today.
1 comments
graypegg 1121 days ago
That’s a good analogy, that does seem to be the guiding aesthetic they’re going for.

It’s austere but I can see why people like it if they’re really into writing as this raw “doesn’t need anything else” medium. I like my silly little pictures and syntax highlighted code samples though.

link
SoftTalker 1121 days ago
The weird thing is you can write like that in HTML if you want to.

    <html>
      Lots of plain text
    </html>
Will render just fine. I don't think any browsers really even require those opening and closing tags.
link
Karellen 1121 days ago
You'll need to do a little bit more if you want paragraphs in your text, because otherwise HTML will just smush them together.
link
rhn_mk1 1121 days ago
It will not. You'll lose line breaks.
link
SoftTalker 1120 days ago
Yes that's true, I'll amend my comment to say that there's nothing about HTML that prevents you from writing in this austere styling if that's all you want to do. Quickly scanning the gemtext intro, it looks like you have headings (three levels), links (but not inline), lists, blockquotes, and preformatted text. That's it. So with these tags you're there:

  <h1> <h2> <h3>
  <p>
  <ul> and <li>
  <a>
  <blockquote>
  <pre>
Granted gemtext markup is slightly more terse, but it would hardly matter in practice.
link