Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by graypegg 1115 days ago
That’s a good analogy, that does seem to be the guiding aesthetic they’re going for.

It’s austere but I can see why people like it if they’re really into writing as this raw “doesn’t need anything else” medium. I like my silly little pictures and syntax highlighted code samples though.

1 comments

The weird thing is you can write like that in HTML if you want to.

    <html>
      Lots of plain text
    </html>
Will render just fine. I don't think any browsers really even require those opening and closing tags.
You'll need to do a little bit more if you want paragraphs in your text, because otherwise HTML will just smush them together.
It will not. You'll lose line breaks.
Yes that's true, I'll amend my comment to say that there's nothing about HTML that prevents you from writing in this austere styling if that's all you want to do. Quickly scanning the gemtext intro, it looks like you have headings (three levels), links (but not inline), lists, blockquotes, and preformatted text. That's it. So with these tags you're there:

  <h1> <h2> <h3>
  <p>
  <ul> and <li>
  <a>
  <blockquote>
  <pre>
Granted gemtext markup is slightly more terse, but it would hardly matter in practice.