Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by greenyoda 1124 days ago
> A chefs product only lasts an hour at most.

A chef's recipe, which is also something the chef creates, may last hundreds of years.

2 comments

That's a very romantic view of the life of a chef but I'm afraid that by an overwhelmingly enormous margin the output of a chef is servings of food not century-spanning recipes.

The comparison between developer and chef is kind of a stretch but there is a similarity of sorts. It could be argued that the recipes are analogous to the algorithms or patterns that we use day-to-day in software development, and that the servings of dinner are analogous to the applications we build. The algorithms/patterns and recipes might persist for a while, the apps and food have a shorter lifetime.

I'm not advocating for throwaway or disposable code (though I'm not above implementing a quick hack, personally) but I don't think we need to think less of ourselves or our profession because we're producing things which currently have a shelf-life of years or decades at most.

But tbf, that happens once in a billion recipes. 99% of new recipes are forgotten, often after a week or two.
Even some of the most famous recipes can change over time. I’m sure that things like McDonald’s burgers are slightly different now.

Perhaps the most enduring a chef can do is invent a new technique.

The Youtuber Max Miller's channel "Tasting History with Max Miller" has a number of good examples of old recipes for now-familiar foods. His Semlor episode[1] compares a recipe from 1755 and one from more modern times, and there are substantial changes.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ljm5i5N6WQ

The chicken nugget and McChicken batter are different from when I worked at McDonald's as a kid. Naturally it was better back then...
IIRC they switch from frying the fries in beef oil to using vegetable oil and the fries have never been quite as good.