|
|
|
|
|
by rchaud
1129 days ago
|
|
If you're providing financial services in a heaivily regulated industry, it's not that big of a leap. The company has a pending application for a UK banking license for the past 28 months; the turnaround time for that in the UK is 12 months. Yet even now, they have filed their accounts several months late, and without a clean bill of health from the auditor. The CFO of all people should have advised withdrawal of their application until internal controls were sorted. That they're resigning instead doesn't bode well. From the FT, their UK operations chief departed as well: https://www.ft.com/content/f27f6b80-d32d-4913-991d-c512f6e90... |
|
The stuff with the accounts already existed, apparently the regulators found these issues when examining their suitability for the licence (I have read from sources online that there is a very significant issue with revenue recognition, as in a percentage of revenue significantly above 50% couldn't be matched in their systems), but the resignations came after they went to the media and tried to bounce the BoE into giving them a licence (spoiler: what the CFO is quoted as saying it is total bollocks, they aren't close to getting a licence).
The media furore in the UK from execs about insufficient levels of executive pay unfortunately has created the space for opportunism like this.