The GP didn't say they're lying about the number, the claim was that the number isn't representative of the amount of Google searches Kagi users are likely to perform.
Kagi pricing page does not talk about Kagi users but Internet users, which Kagi is trying to attract with the $5 plan.
Almost all of current Kagi users are in the other 1% category, but that doesn’t change the fact that vast majority of internet users search 2-3 times a day and that Kagi would like to attract them with this plan.
The obvious implication of putting that on a pricing page is that the average internet user accurately represents the average Kagi user.
I have no idea if that's true or not, but if it isn't, then there isn't really a way to "word it differently" - including the information at all is misleading.
I’m trying to follow the complaint but not getting it.
Are you saying that the average Kagi user, who is an internet power user doing far more than 4 searches a day, is going to be misled into believing they are an average internet user and that they really only do 4 searches a day?
Why is it not representative? I was surprised by this recent Kagi pricing change but after reviewing my search stats I realized that their estimation is pretty on point.
Almost all of current Kagi users are in the other 1% category, but that doesn’t change the fact that vast majority of internet users search 2-3 times a day and that Kagi would like to attract them with this plan.