Is there something else that's relevant? It's 300+ pages of all the information around the situation, though admittedly biased from the landlord's perspective
I was hoping to read more about the dispute you were talking about.
As far as I can tell the dispute is that twitter didn't pay the rent and the building owner wants them to pay the rent, which is how this has been reported.
Page 3, in the middle of them laying out the timeline:
9 14. On or about November 22, 2022, Plaintiff served Defendant with a demand to
10 increase the LOC by $10,000,000 pursuant to Paragraphs 13 and 25 of the Lease. A true
11 and correct copy of such demand is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by
12 this reference. Defendant did not, within the time specified in the notice, or at any other
13 time thereafter, increase the LOC by $10,000,000. Rather, Defendant contended, in
14 response to Plaintiff’s notice, that it was not required to increase the LOC by $10,000,000
15 upon a transfer in control of Defendant under the terms of the Lease.