[Izkata]

Page 3, in the middle of them laying out the timeline:

  9  14. On or about November 22, 2022, Plaintiff served Defendant with a demand to
  10 increase the LOC by $10,000,000 pursuant to Paragraphs 13 and 25 of the Lease. A true
  11 and correct copy of such demand is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by
  12 this reference. Defendant did not, within the time specified in the notice, or at any other
  13 time thereafter, increase the LOC by $10,000,000.  Rather, Defendant contended, in
  14 response to Plaintiff’s notice, that it was not required to increase the LOC by $10,000,000
  15 upon a transfer in control of Defendant under the terms of the Lease.

[ImPostingOnHN]

thus, not only is elmu not paying rent, he's not paying for this LOC increase either

still unclear why elmu thinks he shouldn't have to pay rent