|
|
|
|
|
by mostlystatic
1171 days ago
|
|
I wondered about that when reading the Money Stuff article about it a while ago. What should they actually have done differently? One of the issues was that "she could not share her customer list
due to privacy concerns". So maybe JPM could have pushed back against that more? """Javice also cited privacy concerns in sharing Frank’s customer data directly with
JPMC. After numerous internal conversations, and in order to allay Javice’s concerns, JPMC
agreed to use a third-party data management vendor, Acxiom, to validate Frank’s customer
information rather than providing the personal identifying information directly to JPMC.""" |
|
The gap here was _huge_. If I was the JPM diligence team, I might have asked them for read-only access to their product analytics. They claimed something like 10K FAFSA applications/day. This should show up nicely in their analytics tools. Yes, they could fake these visits--but it would be much harder to fake that you're getting 10K visits from appropriate regions, at appropriate times of day, with appropriate dwell times, with appropriate distribution of completion rates.