|
|
|
|
|
by rcme
1175 days ago
|
|
The math here seems disingenuous. There were 10 accounts with 13B in uninsured deposits. The FDIC used 18B to back the entire deposits of the bank. That doesn't mean 13B / 18B went to those 10 accounts. A better way of thinking about it would be something like: SVB had 170B (random estimate) in uninsured deposits. 13B of the uninsured deposits were from 10 accounts. So (13B / 170B) * 18B = 1.3B went to those 10 accounts. |
|
$56bn [1]. So about 23% of the emergency insured deposits were held by 10 accounts.
If we stuck to the law, that would have been $2.5mm (0.005%). So 10 accounts got a 5,200x courtesy boost in their backing by the full faith and credit by the United States.
[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-27/first-cit...