Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by javajosh 1193 days ago
It sounds interesting to me, and worth trying, but I'd be worried that such a villain would be uninteresting to watch on film. No cackle? No monologuing? They would be pure self-interest, executed calmly and without pity (including self-pity), would do crime but never brag about it, never get caught. Such a one would not be terribly interesting to watch because the villain basically has the mind of a spreadsheet.
1 comments
gen220 1193 days ago
Sounds like the plot to "There will be blood" to me. :)

That was one of the best plots/executions of a plot that I've ever seen!

link
javajosh 1193 days ago
Love "There Will be Blood" (and PTA), but I don't see how it fits. Plainview as a villain was great because his extraordinary, single-minded ambition motivated him to attempt kill his own humanity. But Plainview failed. His humanity was still in there, in long-abused, long-neglected agony and rage, which had its final, full, disgusting eruption in the final scene of the film with Paul Dano's character. It was evidence that Plainview couldn't kill his own humanity. This made him interesting. My spreadsheet villain succeeds in fully killing his own humanity. I don't know if this is even possible, but given the plasticity and variation in the human mind, it probably is. But I still don't think it would be interesting to watch!
link
gen220 1193 days ago
That's a fair point!

I guess the most searing part of the film, in my memory, is the first / middle thirds of the movie. But maybe I only remember the first two thirds because it's balanced so effectively by the ending. :D

I'd watch your movie, but I agree it'd probably be criticized as boring because the anti-hero doesn't "develop". Maybe it'd be better if you focus on their childhood/adolescence, i.e. the experiences that sparked the intent to crush their own humanity. Godfather 2 vibes.

link