[newsiehey]

Did you read the post? He obviously said that he was working on too much at once and then goes on to cut back and say he is happy and focused moving forward...

That is perfectly logical and doesn't invite judgment about his daily activities or "going outside" or whatever you are talking about

[PragmaticPulp]

> Did you read the post?

Yes, which is why I cited specific details from the post in my comment.

I also read some of his other posts which is where I gathered the “monastic code machine” and additional context.

Please don’t jump to conclusions about other people not reading the post when they’re clearly referring to details within.

HN has a guideline about this specifically https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

> Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that".

[newsiehey]

I didn't jump to a conclusion hence the question mark. It's seemed valid since your response whiffs on his conclusion and go off on your own unrelated tangent.

Calling him a clever name and espousing some unsolicited drivel... You don't sound like you are relating at all