[PragmaticPulp]

> Did you read the post?

Yes, which is why I cited specific details from the post in my comment.

I also read some of his other posts which is where I gathered the “monastic code machine” and additional context.

Please don’t jump to conclusions about other people not reading the post when they’re clearly referring to details within.

HN has a guideline about this specifically https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

> Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that".

[newsiehey]

I didn't jump to a conclusion hence the question mark. It's seemed valid since your response whiffs on his conclusion and go off on your own unrelated tangent.

Calling him a clever name and espousing some unsolicited drivel... You don't sound like you are relating at all