[dopidopHN]

Yes, it is absolutely the cheapest in history. Or maybe that was in 2008 actually, when the oil producing countries organisation let us know that we reached peak oil production. Most likely that was the cheapest in human history.

What I’m saying is that it’s not going to be cheaper.

We’re gonna have to work more and more for it. That’s fine.

Back to the solar panel. Can we produce, operate, service them at scale without the support of cheap petrol?

Can we sustain the industrial process without the gas to carry stuff from one place to another?

Can we build those solar panel in a lighter industrial society?

I think so yes. But we need to be drastically more frugal.

Specially in place like North America and Western Europe. I also welcome that as a nice change.

To put some context : let think about the effect of COVID-19 on the global logistic. I think that was not even a warming round.

More specifically to your point :

- yes, you can collect hundred or watt during the day. Again, it’s great.

- yes, you can salvage them and operate them. For 10 years. Then you need to find a fabric of photovoltaic cells to replace them :)

For example of low tech long term energy I would rather pick wind ( basic wind turbine ) or water ( good old dam and turbine )

My point in one sentence : solar is great, but you need the whole modern industrial complex to use them and that complex is about to be shocked by the scarcity of gas.

[moloch-hai]

Solar and wind are still getting cheaper, with no end in sight. Solar, in particular, will soon drop below $10/MWh. Printed thin-film perovskite cells delivered in rolls will sharply undercut prices for rigid panels.

Silicon cells last well beyond 30 years. Even after 40 years, most will still produce 80% of nameplate power; longer if they are kept cool by floating on reservoirs.

Manufacturing relies on energy available. That will increasingly come from renewables as that fraction of generation increases, so dependence on fossil fuel for that will fall in direct proportion. Transportation still relies on petroleum, but it will soon be cheaper to synthesize fuel using renewable energy; ocean shipping will move to ammonia.

There is no scarcity of gas. There will instead be a surfeit as demand falls off, to the point where it will not be worth extracting at a price competitive with renewables. It will still be used where its carbon is needed, although it will see competition from captured carbon.

We do not need to be frugal. We just need to build out renewables faster.

[dopidopHN]

> there is no scarcity of gas.

Is gas not by default, scarce? In the sense that we know that their is limited reserved ? ( as opposed to infinite reserve of solar energy for instance )

I thought OPEC was more clear on that, I found peak oil date in the 2030/2050 range. My understanding was that it was behind us already. Good.

What about storage of solar? We know demands is higher when production is lower ( during winter, in the evening after work and so on )

Don’t we need a second source to complement with something like gas/coal/nuclear ?

> shipping will move to ammonia.

Never heard of it. Great.large ship do consume a lot and our logistic need them.