Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Sightline 1291 days ago
Yes it was, do you not remember everyone being 100% certain it had CP?
2 comments

What? No, I don't remember that; this is the first time I've ever heard anyone say the laptop had CP on it.

EDIT: In fact, let's not rely on our memories. Here's the original NY Post story, the one which you weren't allowed to share on Twitter:

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden...

This article doesn't make any kind of allegations about CP. Why are you making things up?

https://www.newsweek.com/hunter-biden-laptop-qanon-conspirac...

"The conservative radio host Wayne Root claimed without evidence in a tweet shared tens of thousands of times that Hunter Biden's laptop contains videos of him sexually abusing Chinese children."

That's just one article, I remember seeing many YouTube comments and 4chan posts about it, which could suggest they were bots pushing a narrative.

That was one blogger and a handful of commenters on 4chan, by your own admission. Could you edit your comment to remove the word "everyone" since that is clearly not accurate?

The Hunter Biden story is, and has always been, about him selling access to his father to Ukrainian powerbrokers so that what we're seeing unfold now over there would be possible. His claims to be saving "10% for the Big Guy" clearly allude to money being kicked back to his dad the Vice President at the time, and current man in charge of delivering billions of dollars to those same powerbrokers in Ukraine now.

This is what the investigation is about. Nobody cares if Hunter was a drug addict or a douchebag it's always been about the above.

No I'm not changing my comment. I get the feeling you'd shift the goalposts no matter how much proof I show.

Posted today:

https://twitter.com/JoanneRansing/status/1598963377984135183

"Hunter Biden had sex with his niece Natalie. His dead brother's underage daughter - he was also banging her Mom. Will they manage to keep this video secret forever? Lots of people have seen it including me."

https://twitter.com/kuckieman/status/1598895748636372992

"One question, Are you ok with the pictures of Hunter Biden and clearly underage girls? You and Hunter are the problem."

https://twitter.com/wokeantag0nist/status/159901527380973568...

"Hunter had sex with underage girls and used his dad to broker deals against America’s best interest, “ what’s the big heal lolz” congratulations you’re dumb and pathetic enough to be Biden’s next diversity hire"

I don't understand what random tweets from nobodies have to do with what we're discussing.
You: "The Hunter Biden story is, and has always been, about him selling access to his father to Ukrainian powerbrokers"

Me: shows credible proof demonstrating that's not the case

You: feigns confusion

Why are you playing dumb?, sure seems like you get "confused" a lot.

Credible proof to you = random twits from nobodies?

Well, I think we've identified the issue. Please don't look up flat earth tweets, it will break you heart.

None of these are proof? Or is truth whatever a Twitter mob decides it to be?