[Sightline]

No I'm not changing my comment. I get the feeling you'd shift the goalposts no matter how much proof I show.

Posted today:

https://twitter.com/JoanneRansing/status/1598963377984135183

"Hunter Biden had sex with his niece Natalie. His dead brother's underage daughter - he was also banging her Mom. Will they manage to keep this video secret forever? Lots of people have seen it including me."

https://twitter.com/kuckieman/status/1598895748636372992

"One question, Are you ok with the pictures of Hunter Biden and clearly underage girls? You and Hunter are the problem."

https://twitter.com/wokeantag0nist/status/159901527380973568...

"Hunter had sex with underage girls and used his dad to broker deals against America’s best interest, “ what’s the big heal lolz” congratulations you’re dumb and pathetic enough to be Biden’s next diversity hire"

[yucky]

I don't understand what random tweets from nobodies have to do with what we're discussing.

[Sightline]

You: "The Hunter Biden story is, and has always been, about him selling access to his father to Ukrainian powerbrokers"

Me: shows credible proof demonstrating that's not the case

You: feigns confusion

Why are you playing dumb?, sure seems like you get "confused" a lot.

[yucky]

Credible proof to you = random twits from nobodies?

Well, I think we've identified the issue. Please don't look up flat earth tweets, it will break you heart.

[tomrod]

None of these are proof? Or is truth whatever a Twitter mob decides it to be?