|
|
|
|
|
by TacticalCoder
1322 days ago
|
|
> The reason SMS 2FA is popular, is because the average use case is that the user's (reused and/or weak) password was captured somewhere... People are not disputing the effectiveness of 2FA. They're saying that SMS is not a reasonable way to implement 2FA. All my banks' websites in Europe (I've got several) are requiring the use of a physical device, provided by the bank, and protected by a PIN. I need to use such devices both to log in and to confirm wire transfer / stock buys / etc. U2F keys like Yubikeys and physical 2FA devices like those provided by my banks are way better than SMS 2FA. Why not strive towards that instead of saying that SMS 2FA is popular for reasons and that nothing can be done about it? |
|
Email 2FA works just fine. Set a long, secure password for your email account. Trust that your email provider won't allow anyone to brute force their way into the account. Don't use that email for any other accounts. Bam, security is fine.
Stop trying to force more and more purchases and apps down other people's throats. Maybe I don't have a smartphone or a yubikey. I should still be able to use services, especially when many of them are required to function in society today.