[giantg2]

Please cite a source for gender discrimination in admissions. Seems like this would be a textbook Title IX violation.

[MengerSponge]

Look at the incoming class numbers. Harvard/MIT/Princeton/Yale are all within 2% of 50/50.

I don't know how they do it legally, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[giantg2]

Ah, that makes sense. Since those are private schools they don't need to comply with Title IX.

[apress]

Title IX applies to schools that accept federal funding such as Harvard, MIT etc. see for example https://studentlife.mit.edu/titleix

[thaumasiotes]

Title IX specifically does not apply to undergraduate admissions at private universities.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1681

> in regard to admissions to educational institutions, this section shall apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, and graduate higher education, and to public institutions of undergraduate higher education

[giantg2]

Ah, so even though the rest of title IX applies, admissions does not.

[giantg2]

I wasn't aware they accepted funding. So it seems odd they are so evenly balanced.

[scarmig]

Another possibility: men have higher variation in performance than women. Even if the male mean were lower, a greater standard deviation would swamp that effect at the high end.

[thaumasiotes]

> I wasn't aware they accepted funding.

Their researchers apply for grants. That is considered "funding". Enrolling students who have taken out student loans is also considered to be "goverment funding" for the school rather than the student.

[giantg2]

"Enrolling students who have taken out student loans is also considered to be "goverment funding" for the school rather than the student."

Do you have a source for this?