[ornornor]

I see. How much does it suck to work at such a place? I mean in terms of disorganization, constant fire fighting, time to fix existing issues vs implementing new bugs?

Basically I don’t mind working at a boring company so much, what I want is serenity and calm so that my job doesn’t end up taking over my non work time by polluting my mind with stress and worry. Wondering if zombie companies fit the bill.

[revolutukr]

If you aren't a 25 year old kid trying to win the startup lottery at a future unicorn, or getting fat at FAANG, then these jobs are great. They move slower, so their processes are often very well refined, the churn is low and the change/velocity is even.

There are few fires to fight in a stable company with moderate growth, a low change rate, and predictable customer behaviors. Disorganization and exhaustion is usually a side effect of hyper growth.

When I hit 40 or so, I accepted I wasn't going to be a billionaire and that I was too old and too mediocre to get a job at a unicorn. I still provided a lot of value for my customers in last few years of work before I retired from tech.

If you are ready to transition from "My life is my work! I'm going to kill it, crush it, and get my lamb" .. Then look for a stable, low growth company which disappointed investors but not customers.

[llampx]

I think that's more on a case by case basis. In the example I gave, the CEO is capricious so there's a lot of churn because the vision is a moving target, and the company itself isn't growing much so people do their 1-2 years and move on.

[revolutukr]

> so people do their 1-2 years and move on.

Sounds like about 50% of the employees at every company I worked at over 30 years. In the '00s and '10s, there was no such thing as raises unless you were at a public company, so the only way to increase your salary was to job hop every 18-24 months. When you hit your 40s, however, that resume history makes you unhirable I found out.