|
|
|
|
|
by clouddrover
1360 days ago
|
|
> On the other hand I'm not sure I like the idea of government mandating electrical connectors on devices Depends on the device. Standards for EV fast charging are a very good thing. North America has two different plugs and protocols for DC fast charging (three if you count CHAdeMO) and it's a mess. The EU has standardized on CCS Type 2 Combo so any brand of CCS charging car can charge on any brand of CCS charging network. That's good common sense and it benefits everyone. Incompatible charging infrastructure doesn't benefit any EV owner. It's a drag on the EV market. Closed networks like Tesla's and Rivian's are continuing to be part of the problem. Tesla is (very) slowly changing in North America: https://www.theverge.com/2021/7/28/22596337/tesla-supercharg... Rivian still hasn't got the memo. Rivian's chargers are at least CCS but because they're brand exclusive they don't see much use: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbvW0nK38j8 Those chargers could be earning more revenue right now instead of sitting idle. All they have to do is unlock the software. |
|
All new Tesla stations in Europe use CCS and most of the older stations have been retrofitted with CCS connectors in addition to Type 2.
I have an adaptor for my 2017 Model S that allows it to use CCS instead of Type 2 and newer cars can be converted so that CCS connectors can be used without adaptors. All new EVs in Europe already use CCS and Tesla are slowly opening up their network to other brands of car.
So how is Tesla part of the problem?