[projectramo]

The title of this has Tailwind alternative in it. At this point around 100% of the comments are about the comparison to tailwind.

However, open-props never mentions tailwind. That simple mis-title has hijacked the convo.

[lelandfe]

Nor is it from the "Chrome Dev Team." This is just a side project of a Google engineer who is a part of that team[0] https://github.com/argyleink/open-props/graphs/contributors?...

[0] Also, because it's not murky enough, "Chrome Dev" are the DevRel people (community outreach, web.dev articles, conferences, etc), not the "developers of Chrome." https://twitter.com/ChromiumDev

[nindalf]

dang, please re-title this.

[dang]

Doesn't make sense to retitle it now because the thread is so dominated by the editorialized title. I think we need to leave it. This is why the site guidelines contain the rule: "Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

The [flagged] marker, btw, is because users flagged the submission, which they were correct to do.

[oefrha]

Posting "dang, please re-title this" doesn't do anything, you should email [e-mail] instead, as I just did. Dan or some other behind-the-scenes mod usually handle these quickly.

[plibither8]

True, but also interesting. I'm sure dang and the mod team would have a special filter for comments mentioning "@dang" or something alike. Seems imperative and useful.

Edit: ...and if they do, I think I just tagged them unnecessarily. xD

[oefrha]

Pretty sure dang doesn’t have it (well, at least he didn’t when he last posted about this topic), which is why he asks people to email instead.

[nindalf]

You went from certain to “pretty sure” quickly. For me the friction to open my email app is high enough that I might not bother.